Reflection
Part 1-- Thinking and Writing
My four pieces are my Memoir, Scarlet Letter Essay, Crucible Essay, and Nature Walk Essay, but I'll mainly be talking about the two on my blog; My Crucible essay and my Nature Walk essay. When I wrote the Crucible essay, it was after I had written my memoir and Scarlet letter essay, and I still wasn't really used to writing essays, so I was pretty annoyed while writing it; all I was trying to do was figure out how to write a good essay so I could get a good grade on it. It was a metaphor essay about how John Proctor related to a television. Coming up with similarities and differences between each wasn't difficult, but actually writing it in an essay form proved to be a little bit, at first; I had to learn how to keep my main focus on the character John Proctor, and not on what he was being compared to, and also how to be more subtle about how I wrote it and how to better correlate him in my writing to what was actually in the play. It was difficult when I went back and did revisions, because when I had originally wrote the essay, the diction was pretty swift, and every time I went in and added something that may have sounded good in my head, it wouldn't fit; it always seemed too long-winded while everything else moved along smoothly. When I wrote my Nature Walk essay, I was mainly trying to figure out how to make it sound good; I was honestly trying to figure out a way to put more of my 'heart' into my work and how to make it sound like me. I also wanted to be able to add quotations where they seemed most legit and like they really belonged instead of just throwing them in anywhere, and I think I accomplished that for the most part. The essay was about how I agreed with their (Emerson and Thoreau's) ideas with Transcendentalism even though my experience on the nature walk wasn't as nice as I might have liked, and how I can acknowledge the differences between their beliefs and mine. When I first wrote it, it seemed too informal and not really like an essay at all; just like my thoughts being thrown onto a sheet of paper, and I actually had to go back and make it more formal, even though it was supposed to be an informal essay. After I put a little less of me in it and changed things 'here and there' about a thousand times, I thought it was perfect, but Mrs. Turner commented on how I needed to fix my comma errors, so I had to go back and read about them and then fix them. Basically, I better learned about how to use commas (which has actually helped a lot!). In the end, I really loved how I did on this essay and the comments I received from Mrs. Turner, and I noticed how this was a pattern; with every essay I wrote, I liked the proceeding one a little more than the one before it, and I've improved my writing and thinking skills drastically (in my opinion). Three things I have learned that have helped me the most was how to write an essay (obviously), learning when and where to add commas, and that practice with writing and revisions only serves to help in the long run.
Part 2-- Process of Revision
In all four essays, I revised for new ideas; but the craft lessons we learned are probably least apparent in my Crucible essay; but my revisions consisted of me having to change who my focus was on in the essay, and I also had to relate John Proctor to the theme of the play. I really liked the first paragraph but the second proved to be very hard; there seemed to be no easy way to compare John to a TV without it sounding corny, and so I think a lot of it was awkward; but adding how he related to the theme of the play made it seem less forced and more natural; probably because then the whole paragraph wasn't literally about the comparisons and contrasts between the two. In the conclusion, it was hard to restate what I proved in the essay without sounding really redundant because the essay wasn't very long, and when you summarize something seemingly short, it can sound almost the same. An example of where I revised for new ideas is in my Crucible essay is when I added how he contributes to the theme of the play (I decided it was betrayal), and this is evident mainly in the second paragraph when it talks about how Abigail was able to 'throw' and 'smash' John: [link]. In my Nature Walk essay, I revised the whole thing when I tried to not make it as personal as I had originally, and when I had to fix the first sentence so my classmates would actually know what I was talking about when they read it. Using the 'Examples of Transcendental Thought' sheet and practicing writing quotes helped me revise my quotes so they fit the essay, and so it flowed smoothly after doing so. I fixed any and all awkward sentences after I made it not so personal, and because the essay is pretty long, I avoided too much (obvious) repetition in the last paragraph. An example where I revised using craft lessons learned is in the Nature Walk essay like I just stated (through the quotes): [link] And the example of fixing the awkward sentence structure can be found in the Crucible (after I added how John related to the theme): [link]
Part 3-- Learning from your Classmates
One of the most important things I learned is that it's important to use good word choice and diction while writing an essay; it helps to form the tone and over all feel of your essay, and I saw this as very apparent in Luke's Nature Essay; as you can see, it sounds professional and well written. Another important thing I learned is how to be persuasive in an essay, and this is apparent in Natalie's Scarlet Letter Essay; as you can see, her calm tone of voice makes the essay very believable. Another important thing I learned, I got from Dylan; after reading his Crucible Essay, I realized how you're never really supposed to use 'I' in essays; hence, 'One' could say... I actually remember an English teacher talking about it one year, but he helped me remember, and I think it's important. :)
Saturday, October 20, 2007
Reflection-- The Crucible and Nature Walk Essay
Posted by
Jennifer C
at
6:59 PM
1 comments
Labels: nature walk, reflection, the crucible
Thursday, October 11, 2007
The Crucible
In the play, The Crucible, Aurthur Miller's protagonist is John Proctor. He's a farmer and a well respected man in town, but he has a terrible secret; he's had an affair with Abigail Williams. Abigail is very vengeful towards John when he refuses to continue the affair, which causes the beginning of the Salem Witch Trials-- the persecution of accused witches-- and John, along with eventually everyone else in the town, has to suffer for it. Many innocent people are tried and hanged in a court that's based off of vengeance, all because John didn't admit for the sake of his own reputation; but when he finally does, he realizes it's far too late to turn back, and he is forced to chose between his reputation and integrity or his life; a sinful, corrupted pleasure turned into the corruption of a whole town, as Abigail found a way to corrupt John, a generally pure man.
There are many ways to symbolize a man like John; an example could even be a television. John educated people and taught them things; he tried to to tell the people of the town that the girls were lying and Hale eventually got the message; just as tv's can educate people and teach them things. Abigail had the ability to 'throw' John as she used his betrayal of his wife as ammo until the guilt 'smashed' him both mentally and symbolically; it had grown in him and grew in the town after the mass hysteria was over-- just as you can throw and smash a tv. Being a big name in the town, John was often watched; just like a television. A difference could be that he was well rounded-- he was courageous, brave, and determined; he tried to put a stop to all the false truths and the disloyalty of the people in Salem, just as he had been in the very beginning-- while tv's generally are square. John also was not lazy, and tv's tend to make people the exact opposite; and John also had the ability to be 'dark' at times and 'light up', the same way a tv is dark when turned off and then, at times, can kindle a whole room.
John taught and educated, was watched, thrown and smashed by guilt, had his light moments and dark moments, and was a seemingly judicious man; but when it comes down to it, he's the best symbol for himself.
Posted by
Jennifer C
at
4:26 PM
0
comments
Labels: book, essay, the crucible